Product Liability Claim Against 3M Company: Defective Ear Equipment Provided to the UK Military
We are initiating a product liability claim for hearing loss against 3M Company for supplying defective ear protection equipment to the UK military. This action mirrors a significant volume of litigation currently being pursued against 3M in the United States, including cases led by the Lanier Law Firm, over the same defective earplugs.
“One of the British military’s core values is integrity. By supplying earplugs they knew were defective, 3M showed no integrity.
It is only right that the men and women whose lives have been impacted receive justice and compensation.”
Tom Longstaff | Partner & Head of Product Liability
Military personnel are routinely exposed to high levels of noise during both training and active duty, often experiencing percussive sounds capable of causing severe hearing damage. Properly designed and effective ear protection is crucial in these environments. Suppliers, like 3M, have a legal obligation to provide equipment that meets safety standards and is fit for purpose. The failure of 3M’s ear protection equipment has caused widespread noise-induced hearing loss among UK military personnel.
The Royal British Legion has highlighted the serious issue of hearing loss among veterans, estimating that around 300,000 former service members currently suffer from noise-induced hearing damage, including tinnitus. Research shows that veterans under 75 years old are 3.5 times more likely to suffer from hearing-related issues than the general population, with many affected seeking support.
Did you serve in the UK military and use 3M’s earplugs?
If you used 3M’s defective earplugs during your service and suffered from hearing loss, tinnitus, or other hearing-related injuries, you may be eligible for a claim.
Have you experienced noise-induced hearing loss or tinnitus following your service?
Veterans who have experienced hearing damage, including tinnitus, due to inadequate protection from 3M earplugs can seek compensation for their injuries.
Are you already involved in a hearing loss claim against the Ministry of Defence (MOD)?
Even if you are part of a claim against the MOD, you can still pursue compensation from 3M as the manufacturer of the defective ear protection.
At KP Law, we represent clients in group actions with the innovation, resources and expertise needed to take on complex cases. Our product liability specialists have more than 50 years of combined experience, making us one of the most experienced multi-claimant law firms in the UK. Working alongside leading barristers and legal experts, we provide the highest standard of support while leveraging the resources and global expertise required to pursue challenging claims successfully. With offices in London, Liverpool, Manchester and Birmingham, supported by technology that enables us to serve clients across England and Wales, we combine national reach with a modern, client-focused approach. By using innovative technology, operating on a no-win, no-fee basis, and keeping the process straightforward and hassle-free, we make accessing expert legal representation as simple as possible.
The legal claim against 3M stems from the company’s supply of defective ear protection equipment to the UK military. These earplugs failed to provide adequate protection against high levels of noise exposure, which led to significant hearing damage for many service personnel. By targeting 3M directly, we aim to hold them accountable as the manufacturer of the defective products.
While multiple claims for hearing loss are currently being filed against the MOD, this claim focuses on 3M as the supplier of faulty personal protective equipment (PPE), rather than the MOD as the employer. By pursuing 3M, this legal action seeks to hold the manufacturer responsible, offering an avenue of compensation for those affected by noise-induced hearing loss while serving.
Any current or former military personnel who used 3M’s earplugs and suffered from hearing loss, tinnitus, or other related injuries may be eligible to join the claim.
Yes, 3M is currently facing extensive litigation in the United States for supplying defective ‘Combat Arms’ earplugs to the US military between 2003 and 2015. A significant settlement scheme is reportedly being finalised in the US. Many cases that have already gone to trial in the US have established that 3M’s earplugs were inadequately designed and failed to protect military personnel from noise exposure.
You can register your interest by contacting our legal team. This claim is being pursued on a no-win, no-fee basis, meaning you will only pay legal fees if the case is successful. Our team will guide you through the process, ensuring that you have all the necessary information to join the action against 3M.
This development comes despite Harrods previously stating that it accepted vicarious liability for the ‘despicable sexual abuse’ suffered by hundreds of survivors.This latest disclosure, on the day of the second anniversary of the documentary that highlighted the scale of the abuse by Fayed and his team of enablers, follows the
Disclosure of the true value comes as Harrods reports that its much criticised Redress Scheme only paid a total of £4.1m in compensation to just over 50 survivors in the year up to January 2026 and has only set aside £51.8m for all future claims. KP Law, which is representing
KP Law, the law firm representing more than 275 survivors in their abuse and exploitation claims against Harrods and the Estate of Mohamed Al Fayed, has today announced that it has formally written to the Metropolitan Police on behalf of clients affected by the disclosure of more than 140 survivors’
“KP law have been outstanding in all areas of my claim. They have kept me up to date with proceedings. They have been open and honest, no false promises. They have been very professional and persistent through a long and complicated process. Very dedicated throughout. Thank you.” – Kevin
“Used KP Law when making a claim. Very professional experience. Along the way, I received detailed and thorough explanations at important junctures. I found this incredibly useful. Gratefully, I received compensation and payment of this was fast and effective. Overall, a welcome experience.” – Scott
“Superb service from a well established company with a proven track record of success. From start to finish the staff were knowledgeable and helpful. I was guided through the process of making a claim which was successful and I received a financial payment commensurate to the issue.” – Phil
